Page 227 - UCT Research Report 2011

Basic HTML Version

225
FACULTY OF LAW
Tong, L. 2011. Intellectual-property rights as human rights.
In A. van der Merwe (ed.), Law of Intellectual Property
in South Africa, pp. 435-439. Durban: LexisNexis. ISBN
9780409022759.
Tong, L. 2011. Introduction – the interface between
intellectual-property rights and human rights. In A. van der
Merwe (ed.), Law of Intellectual Property in South Africa,
pp. 433-434. Durban: LexisNexis. ISBN 9780409022759.
Tong, L. 2011. Protecting traditional knowledge in South
Africa. In A. van der Merwe (ed.), Law of Intellectual
Property in South Africa, pp. 383-385. Durban: LexisNexis.
ISBN 9780409022759.
Tong, L. 2011. Reconciling intellectual-property rights
and human rights. In A. van der Merwe (ed.), Law of
Intellectual Property in South Africa, pp. 459-460. Durban:
LexisNexis. ISBN 9780409022759.
Tong, L. 2011. The impact of intellectual-property rights on
human rights. In A. van der Merwe (ed.), Law of Intellectual
Property in South Africa, pp. 441-457. Durban: LexisNexis.
ISBN 9780409022759.
Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals
Barnard-Naude, A.J. 2011. Deconstruction is what
happens. Stellenbosch Law Review, 22(1): 160-172.
Barnard-Naude, A.J. anddeVos, P. 2011. Theheteronormative
observer: the Constitutional Court’s decision in Le Roux v
Dey. South African Law Journal, 128(3): 407-419.
Barratt, A. 2011. Clarifying protection of spouses married
in Community of Property? [Discussion of Visser V Hull
2010 1 SA 521 (WCC) and Bopae V Moloto 2000 1 SA 383
(T)]. Stellenbosch Law Review, 22(2): 272-284.
Barratt, A. and Afadameh-Adeyemi, A. 2011. Indigenous
peoples and the right to culture: the potential significance
for African indigenous communities of the Committee on
Economic Social and Cultural Rights’ General Comment
21. African Human Rights Law Journal, 11: 560-587.
Fagan, A. 2011. The Constitutional Court loses its (and
our) sense of humour: Le Roux v Dey. South African Law
Journal, 128(3): 395-407.
Jonker, J.D. 2010. Truth, amnesty and defamation: the
Citizen v McBride 2010 (4) SA 148 (SCA). South African
Law Journal, 127(3): 381-397.
Kruuse, H. 2011. ‘The art of the possible’ in realising
socio-economic rights: City of Johannesburg Metropolitan
Municipality v Blue Moonlight Properties 39 (Pty)Ltd. South
African Law Journal, 128(4): 620-632.
Mostert, H. 2011. Tenure security reform and electronic
registration: exploring insights from English Law.
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 14(3): 86-117.
Naude, T. 2011. Pre-emption agreements and the myth
of the “trigger event” as any manifestation of a decision
to sell: a response to Deeksha Bhana. Journal of
Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 74(1): 87-106.
Nothling-Slabbert, M., Maister, B., Botes, M. and Pepper,
M.S. 2011. The application of the Consumer Protection
Act in the South African health care context: concerns and
recommendations. Comparative and International Law
Journal of Southern Africa, 44(2): 168-203
Pope, A. 2011. Inaedificatio revisited: looking backwards
in search of clarity. South African Law Journal, 128(1):
123-146.
Pope, A. 2011. The alternative accommodation conundrum:
trends and patterns in eviction jurisprudence. Speculum
Juris, 25(1): 134-147.
Schonwetter, T. and Ncube, C.B. 2011. New hope for
Africa? Copyright and access to knowledge in the digital
age. The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for
Telecommunications, Information and Media, 13(3): 64-74.
Scott, H. 2011. South Africa. Restitution Law Review, 19:
246-252.
Scott, H. 2011. Unjustified enrichment. Annual Survey of
South African Law, 1(2010): 1401-1410.